NA: 1991 M5

Buy, sell or trade whole vehicles.
Post Reply
packman21
Posts: 973
Joined: Feb 15, 2009 10:56 AM
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

NA: 1991 M5

Post by packman21 »

NA: But I believe this guy is a member on S14.net.

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?sid=0&nid= ... ad=7697200
rmiddendorf
Posts: 5568
Joined: Jul 11, 2010 1:17 PM
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by rmiddendorf »

That's an interesting car. It would probably make a good daily driver for someone.

Any chance you could start putting your non-affiliated cars in the non-affiliated thread? No biggie, just tossing it out there. I do like your additions as you bring up cars that no one else appears to bring to the table.
packman21
Posts: 973
Joined: Feb 15, 2009 10:56 AM
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by packman21 »

Sure I will do that from now on.
tsmall07
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 12775
Joined: May 22, 2006 4:32 PM
Location: Springfield, vA

Post by tsmall07 »

Am I missing the price somewhere?
rmiddendorf
Posts: 5568
Joined: Jul 11, 2010 1:17 PM
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by rmiddendorf »

tsmall07 wrote:Am I missing the price somewhere?
It was $6900 when I looked yesterday.
packman21
Posts: 973
Joined: Feb 15, 2009 10:56 AM
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by packman21 »

Yeah, the price is still there, as mentioned it is $6,900.
tsmall07
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 12775
Joined: May 22, 2006 4:32 PM
Location: Springfield, vA

Post by tsmall07 »

Where does it say that? Am I going nuts?
packman21
Posts: 973
Joined: Feb 15, 2009 10:56 AM
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by packman21 »

tsmall07 wrote:Where does it say that? Am I going nuts?
After you click on the link it will appear next to the main picture of the car. It does not appear in the body of the description of the ad. I copied and pasted this from the ad if it helps:

1991 BMW M5
St. George, UT 84780 - Apr 3, 2012
$6,900
For Sale by Owner
Ad: # 7697200
Contact: Kyle
Cell: 435-272-2920
Member since: Oct 07
Page Views: 580
Favorite of: 1 person
Jeremy
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 15844
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Connecticut

Post by Jeremy »

tsmall07 wrote:Am I missing the price somewhere?
You're not crazy. It appears AdBlock blocks the part where the price and contact information is displayed.
packman21
Posts: 973
Joined: Feb 15, 2009 10:56 AM
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by packman21 »

Jeremy wrote:
tsmall07 wrote:Am I missing the price somewhere?
You're not crazy. It appears AdBlock blocks the part where the price and contact information is displayed.
Figured it was something blocking it on your side. Good luck.
tsmall07
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 12775
Joined: May 22, 2006 4:32 PM
Location: Springfield, vA

Post by tsmall07 »

Jeremy wrote:
tsmall07 wrote:Am I missing the price somewhere?
You're not crazy. It appears AdBlock blocks the part where the price and contact information is displayed.
That's weird. Looks like a pretty good price to me, though. I would be interested if I didn't have the 540.
Pavel
Posts: 1488
Joined: Jan 02, 2012 2:07 PM
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Post by Pavel »

Looks pretty good for that price range.
Sharkbite
Posts: 43
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:24 AM
Location: Albany NY

Post by Sharkbite »

I wonder where the exhaust tips are ?
Tim in N FL
Posts: 7392
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: North Central Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Tim in N FL »

FWIW, earlier this year, I sold my nicely-kept 1991 M5 (same color scheme) but with 186k miles for just over ~$8500 and was happy to get it. If this car is as clean as it looks, it is well priced. Odd about exhaust tips though. They may have fallen off? :dunno:
unt0uchable
Posts: 2265
Joined: Jul 21, 2011 8:05 PM
Location: Rochester Hills, Michigan
Contact:

Post by unt0uchable »

Please PLEASE excuse my majoy ignorance with the topic. How is that these cars are so much less to purchase than the e28 ///M5? Is it just that they were not as rare or desirable? I'd love to scoop up an M5 for under $10k for the wife to drive. lol.
1st 5er
Posts: 21865
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 12:15 AM
Location: Cypress
Contact:

Post by 1st 5er »

Who has an accurate production number source?
Wiki doesn't show them.
rcbmw
Posts: 846
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by rcbmw »

1st 5er wrote:Who has an accurate production number source?
Wiki doesn't show them.
1,296 for the North American 1991 model year.

Best,
RCBMW
1st 5er
Posts: 21865
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 12:15 AM
Location: Cypress
Contact:

Post by 1st 5er »

rcbmw wrote:
1st 5er wrote:Who has an accurate production number source?
Wiki doesn't show them.
1,296 for the North American 1991 model year.

Best,
RCBMW
Thanks you, and for '92 and '93 respectively?
And, the source, if I may be so bold?
A friend had sent me this link http://e34m5.se/forum/M536usafarger.asp , but I thought surely more than 125 in '92.
Pavel
Posts: 1488
Joined: Jan 02, 2012 2:07 PM
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Post by Pavel »

I am pretty sure those numbers are pretty correct. '92 is quite rare but not much different compared to '91. The big differences came in 1993 with the M mirrors, darker wood trim and some stuff I am forgetting. Highly desirable and in good condition those can touch 20k easily. After 1993 as most of you probably know there was no more E34 M5 in the US while in Europe the S38B38 was deployed. Here in 1994 and 1995 we got 540 M-Sport (only 139 http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh ... ?t=1340651) based on 540i/6 (1524 http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh ... ?t=1357930 ).
wkohler
Posts: 50924
Joined: Oct 05, 2006 11:04 PM
Location: Phönix, Arizona, USA
Contact:

Post by wkohler »

I use www.bmwmregistry.com for all of my M-related information needs.
1st 5er
Posts: 21865
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 12:15 AM
Location: Cypress
Contact:

Post by 1st 5er »

Her '92 just became rarer. :)
rcbmw
Posts: 846
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by rcbmw »

1st 5er wrote: And, the source, if I may be so bold?
I am the source Image. The correct numbers for the North American M5 are 121 for the 1992 model year and 261 for the 1993 model year.

Best,
RCBMW
1st 5er
Posts: 21865
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 12:15 AM
Location: Cypress
Contact:

Post by 1st 5er »

rcbmw wrote:
1st 5er wrote: And, the source, if I may be so bold?
I am the source Image. The correct numbers for the North American M5 are 121 for the 1992 model year and 261 for the 1993 model year.

Best,
RCBMW
That's what I thought. Image

Thanks... :haul:
Jeremy
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 15844
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Connecticut

Post by Jeremy »

rcbmw wrote:I am the source Image.
:laugh: /endthread
packman21
Posts: 973
Joined: Feb 15, 2009 10:56 AM
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Post by packman21 »

Sharkbite wrote:I wonder where the exhaust tips are ?
FWIW: The owner tells me it has aftermarket exhaust and he cut the tips because they looked ugly. Never got around to fixing it. The engine and other things needed more attention.
KYLE IIIM
Posts: 35
Joined: Dec 24, 2008 6:10 PM
Location: St george, Utah

Post by KYLE IIIM »

I'm the owner of this sweet ride. This is my 5th M car I've owned and will miss it but looking for a bigger car like a x5 or x3. I also have a e30 M so I guess the M5 has got to go. I think the price is far and it shouldn't last long. I might just put skittle more money into the cosmetic stuff and put the price where other e34 Ms are sitting at 9-12k.
Post Reply