TCD-s2 325i vs GTI 1.8T (video back up)

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

I attended a dyno day in Columbus last Saturday hoping to get a few pulls but arrived late and all the spots were taken. I hung out for a few hours and a 2002 GTI gets on the dyno. I do not get too excited until I here it puts down 348fwhp/358fwtq at 25psi! It had a APR Stage 3 kit. I practically beg the young man to run me in my old 325i. He wants to run from 70mph but I decline. I am getting old and wise and a 70-140mph run in the middle of the day on public roads seemed a little too risky. I finally talk him into a run from 40mph. It's a short but sweet run from 40-95. I hit the brakes at 95mph when the outcome is not in doubt.

My 325i has a recently rebuilt but totally stock m20b25 with a Cometic MLS HG and Raceware head studs as the only mods. Running a 1 bar boost spring the engine was seeing a solid 16psi. Ambient temp was 25F. Car felt pretty stout.

GTI turned the boost down slightly for the run and was carrying a single passenger with video camera.

Props to the driver of the GTI who emailed me the video!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0874&q=TCD

Enjoy,
Todd

[Edit by TCD on [TIME]1133909582[/TIME]]
Jeremy
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 15844
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Connecticut

Post by Jeremy »

Nicely done. Any idea how much boost he was really running? 20psi maybe? Good to see someone who's a good sport about the whole thing.

Jeremy
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="Jeremy"]Nicely done. Any idea how much boost he was really running? 20psi maybe? Good to see someone who's a good sport about the whole thing.

Jeremy[/QUOTE]

Not sure. He said it was down a little bit.



[Edit by TCD on [TIME]1133877595[/TIME]]
Lee in Ottawa
Posts: 62
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by Lee in Ottawa »

Awsome vid, what are the numbers on your car?
shifty
Posts: 2552
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Greenville, SC
Contact:

Post by shifty »

Good stuff, Todd! That little 3 looks mean!
rundatrack
Posts: 454
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by rundatrack »

Iz the link going ot come back up...any time soon...

that sounds great...
Jeremy
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 15844
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Connecticut

Post by Jeremy »

works for me . . .
BKCowGod3
Posts: 2634
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Contact:

Post by BKCowGod3 »

You guys gonna get your CARB certification any time soon? :P

I'm droolin!
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="Lee in Ottawa"]Awsome vid, what are the numbers on your car? [/QUOTE]

~325rwhp/325rwtq

I'll try to dyno it next week.

Todd
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="bkcowgod2"]You guys gonna get your CARB certification any time soon? :P[/QUOTE]

Sorry, it's too cost prohibitive.
rundatrack
Posts: 454
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by rundatrack »

If you guys would have continued you think that he would have caught you upstairs...

He actually had the jump initially....

That is very very cool....

Good Show...
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="rundatrack"]If you guys would have continued you think that he would have caught you upstairs...[/QUOTE]

No chance, I pulled him hard in 3rd gear and 4th gear would have been worse for him.
BDK
Posts: 5291
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by BDK »

It's not fun until there is blue lights!!!...

uuuuhhh.....Mr Speed...
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="BNC"]It's not fun until there is blue lights!!!...

uuuuhhh.....Mr Speed...[/QUOTE]

I have not been pulled over since!
bahnstormer
Posts: 212
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by bahnstormer »

wow 40-95 was about my 50-60 time
heheheh
russc
Posts: 1759
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by russc »

Nice,
Umm, if you watch that vid carefully, the only reason that GTI pulled intially was that he got on the gas 0.5 second before Todd. The driver thats runs the horn will usally have a slight jump as its only natural to WOT just as the horn is blown, and you can see it in the video. Todd has to hear it, then react, so the avg reaction time for humans is 0.6s. Thats the difference.

But, I will take the GTI side on a hunch. And that is at much higher speeds the GTI might pull a E30 brick due to better aerodynamics, but that would be in the 120mph and higher range where that may make a difference.

Was that GTI a auto?

RussC
Jesse
Posts: 103
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by Jesse »

For the 1.8 GTI to have a chance it would have to be spun way up and stay there. Did it even get close to spun up?

I think the e30 would win in any kind of race though because it would make more power in more of the RPM range than the GTI anyway. The GTI would make more just at the very top of the range.
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="russc"]Nice,
Umm, if you watch that vid carefully, the only reason that GTI pulled intially was that he got on the gas 0.5 second before Todd. The driver thats runs the horn will usally have a slight jump as its only natural to WOT just as the horn is blown, and you can see it in the video. Todd has to hear it, then react, so the avg reaction time for humans is 0.6s. Thats the difference.

But, I will take the GTI side on a hunch. And that is at much higher speeds the GTI might pull a E30 brick due to better aerodynamics, but that would be in the 120mph and higher range where that may make a difference.

Was that GTI a auto?

RussC[/QUOTE]

It was a 5 speed. No way he was ever going to catch me! Aerodynamics didn't help that 996 that I destroyed in my 535i a few years ago.
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

[QUOTE="Jesse "]For the 1.8 GTI to have a chance it would have to be spun way up and stay there. Did it even get close to spun up?

I think the e30 would win in any kind of race though because it would make more power in more of the RPM range than the GTI anyway. The GTI would make more just at the very top of the range. [/QUOTE]

It actually makes great power from 4500-7000rpm. Very simialr to the m20b25 actually.
Todd
russc
Posts: 1759
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by russc »

I guess I don't remeber the 996 story, refresh my memory(a link to a thread I forgot?)? Did you guys race to say 160-170mph? That would be where I think the BMW '80s bricks would fall down. Now granted, you are running 75-90hp more than a stock 996. Its that 120mph and higher area Im not sure about. A few tenths in the Cd scale can make a big difference at those speeds. And, as I said, it "may" be faster, not "is" faster :D

RussC

[QUOTE="russc"]Nice,
Umm, if you watch that vid carefully, the only reason that GTI pulled intially was that he got on the gas 0.5 second before Todd. The driver thats runs the horn will usally have a slight jump as its only natural to WOT just as the horn is blown, and you can see it in the video. Todd has to hear it, then react, so the avg reaction time for humans is 0.6s. Thats the difference.

But, I will take the GTI side on a hunch. And that is at much higher speeds the GTI might pull a E30 brick due to better aerodynamics, but that would be in the 120mph and higher range where that may make a difference.

Was that GTI a auto?

RussC[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="TCD"]It was a 5 speed. No way he was ever going to catch me! Aerodynamics didn't help that 996 that I destroyed in my 535i a few years ago.[/QUOTE]
Jesse
Posts: 103
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by Jesse »

[QUOTE="TCD"]It actually makes great power from 4500-7000rpm. Very simialr to the m20b25 actually.
Todd[/QUOTE]

Are you saying you had comparable power but you walked away anyway? Did he bog it down then (screw up)? Please elaborate.

Either you had more in the RPM range you were in or he screwed up or you were a lot lighter then him. Am I missing something here? It stands to reason that his little 1.8 could not load up his big turbo fast enough to spin up/spool up to his prime power point - right??
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

Jesse,

You need the facts.

Turbos
GTI = GT28RS ball bearing
325i = T04E-50

I was the one with the bigger turbo. He is maxxed out on his.

GTI = 2932lbs plus 150lb passenger
325i = 2765lbs no passenger

317lb weight advantage. That's enough to justify the result.

Incidentals:

This was not my first street race. I chose a speed that was ideal for my car. 4600rpm in 2nd gear. I figured the HP was abt even or I had an advantage. I also knew I had a weight advantage. Result was just as I expected.

Todd


[Edit by TCD on [TIME]1134161073[/TIME]]
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

I guess I don't remeber the 996 story, refresh my memory(a link to a thread I forgot?)? Did you guys race to say 160-170mph? That would be where I think the BMW '80s bricks would fall down. Now granted, you are running 75-90hp more than a stock 996. Its that 120mph and higher area Im not sure about. A few tenths in the Cd scale can make a big difference at those speeds. And, as I said, it "may" be faster, not "is" faster :D

RussC
]


December 2003

535i non intercooled vs 996C4S

70-130

Complete destruction, probably 6-8 car lengths!
russc
Posts: 1759
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by russc »

Right,
Ok, so ya, the same thing as above, ~15% more power, 400lbs less weight. Thats ~right. Thats the beauty of these old cars, less weight than modern cars.

RussC
I guess I don't remeber the 996 story, refresh my memory(a link to a thread I forgot?)? Did you guys race to say 160-170mph? That would be where I think the BMW '80s bricks would fall down. Now granted, you are running 75-90hp more than a stock 996. Its that 120mph and higher area Im not sure about. A few tenths in the Cd scale can make a big difference at those speeds. And, as I said, it "may" be faster, not "is" faster :D

RussC
]


December 2003

535i non intercooled vs 996C4S

70-130

Complete destruction, probably 6-8 car lengths!
TCD wrote:

December 2003

535i non intercooled vs 996C4S

70-130

Complete destruction, probably 6-8 car lengths!


[Edit by russc on [TIME]1134160787[/TIME]]
Mike K
Posts: 404
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Bloomfield, NJ

Post by Mike K »

I was the lucky passenger in Todd's 535i when we raced the 996. The expression on the Porker driver's face was priceless as he helplessly moved over (before Todd mowed him down) @ 90 and we passed him like he was standing still. No doubt aerodynamics would eventally tip the scales back in the 996's favor, but no one would ever see that velocity on US roads.
Threeshifter
Posts: 704
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by Threeshifter »

Dear Santa,
I have been very good this year. If you could, there is something I would like for my car
Jesse
Posts: 103
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by Jesse »

[QUOTE="TCD"]Jesse,

You need the facts.

Turbos
GTI = GT28RS ball bearing
325i = T04E-50

I was the one with the bigger turbo. He is maxxed out on his.

GTI = 2932lbs plus 150lb passenger
325i = 2765lbs no passenger

317lb weight advantage. That's enough to justify the result.

Incidentals:

This was not my first street race. I chose a speed that was ideal for my car. 4600rpm in 2nd gear. I figured the HP was abt even or I had an advantage. I also knew I had a weight advantage. Result was just as I expected.

Todd

[Edit by TCD on [TIME]1134161073[/TIME]][/QUOTE]

Yep. Facts are always good. ;)
Post Reply