3.73 or 3.91 Diff?

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
LonZo
Posts: 12
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by LonZo »

1985 535 with ZF4hp22 automatic. I plan on building a custom turbo setup soon, shooting for 400 rwhp. Car currently has a LSD 3.25 rear diff. I was wondered from anyone here that might have experience or suggestions.

Should I go with the 3.73 rear Diff ?

Or the 3.91 ?

I was wondering if I chose the 3.91, I would regret it, and would then wish I had the 3.73 instead.

Thanks
Lonzo
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

Totally depends on your driving style. Start with a 3.73LSD. They are cheap and easy to find.
Todd
Bill in MN
Posts: 1718
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: The Boonies, Mn
Contact:

Post by Bill in MN »

My 3.73 is great for daily driving. I've no experience with the 3.91.
bahnstormer
Posts: 212
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by bahnstormer »

the 3.91 was in my sisters 90 535ia
and we swapped it for a 4.27
much better oomph at the expense of some
top speed is in my opinion worth it...the auto's
need it esp in the e34
canyoncarver
Posts: 1123
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by canyoncarver »

used a 3.91 in my kid brothers NA 88 535 with the sport auto. engine revs are consistent with a 3.73 equipped 5 speed car.
offers much more response and fun factor than your current 3.25s.......
LonZo
Posts: 12
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by LonZo »

Thanks for the response. Always great advice at this forum.

Cheers
Lonzo
gol10dr1
Posts: 394
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: boston (maryland during summer)

Post by gol10dr1 »

if you have 400 ish hp, that 3.25 would be great for highway driving and all around acceleration. if you plan on doing some drag racing then the 3.91 would come into play. i personally dont think you shoud change but i also have 420 ish hp and i have a 3.45 that i am pretty happy with so you might want to go for something taller. top end will be sacrificed but that means you can only go 130 mph instead of 135!
LonZo
Posts: 12
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by LonZo »

[QUOTE="gol10dr1"]if you have 400 ish hp, that 3.25 would be great for highway driving and all around acceleration. if you plan on doing some drag racing then the 3.91 would come into play. i personally dont think you shoud change but i also have 420 ish hp and i have a 3.45 that i am pretty happy with so you might want to go for something taller. top end will be sacrificed but that means you can only go 130 mph instead of 135![/QUOTE]

Thanks, but do you also have an Automatic? If I had the 260 Manual Transmission, yes I would keep the 3.25 or go even with a 2.93.

Lonzo
Tjn182
Posts: 1782
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Charlotte, NC

Post by Tjn182 »

I have a manual, I'm thinking about plopping on something a little shorter than my 3.25. I might hit up some junkyards when I get to Charlotte today.
gol10dr1
Posts: 394
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: boston (maryland during summer)

Post by gol10dr1 »

[QUOTE="LonZo"]Thanks, but do you also have an Automatic? If I had the 260 Manual Transmission, yes I would keep the 3.25 or go even with a 2.93.

Lonzo[/QUOTE]

nope, 5 speed.
Bill in MN
Posts: 1718
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: The Boonies, Mn
Contact:

Post by Bill in MN »

As far as I know, Todd and I are probably the only ones that have auto trannys in our turbo cars. My car didn't come alive until I put the 3.73 in it. You also may want to think about a 3k rpm torque converter. It too made a big difference in the overall performance.
Post Reply