In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

E28 technical advice asked and given! Troubleshooting, modifications and more.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

All the above seems so much more complicated than it needs to be. Either that, or I'm missing something.

Here's my original setup. Total depth is 22.5cm.
Image

Here's my OE hanger and my new Walbro 340 pump at about the length it needs to be. Note the outlet from the Walbro fits inside the OE outlet pipe.
Image

The stock rubber reducer is too long by about 1cm. I don't see why I can't just cut it and use hose clamps like this and call it a day?
Image

I realize I'll need to secure the pump to the carrier, but why did the OP need to do all the fabrication when this appears it will work fine?
Bav Ace
Posts: 43
Joined: Jan 06, 2011 12:33 PM
Location: Bryan, TX

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by Bav Ace »

I don't doubt that you can make that setup work. I approached the problem the way I did primarily because I enjoy tinkering. It's definitely not the easiest solution.
1st 5er
Posts: 21858
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 12:15 AM
Location: Cypress
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by 1st 5er »

That looks simple enough Charlie.
I'll have to give that a try next time with the TRE-340's we are using.

There's still a hose reduction that has to be dealt with when you remove the outside pump.
That can be handled by some kind of reducer, which I've used in one of my applications, whereas OP's setup takes care of it at the housing and now only one size fuel hose is required throughout the system.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

Image

I think that'll do it.

Now need to run to Ace to get something to reduce the line into the filter.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

For reducing from tank line to filter: How hackey/awful would it be if I just wrapped the inlet nipple of the filter with f4 or electrical tape to make its diameter larger?

Or, are nylon couplings ok with fuel?
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

Best I could find at Ace was this Nylon 1/2x3/8" ID reducer with barbs. Seems like it will work fine.

Image

The hose it's connected to will go to the inlet on the filter. Then the big side will go to the big line that comes out of the tank. This way I can leave the filter in place exactly as it is and simply remove the old pump.
Image
craigb93
Posts: 718
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Cumming, GA

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by craigb93 »

cek wrote:Image

I think that'll do it.

Now need to run to Ace to get something to reduce the line into the filter.
I do not recommend you leave the plastic zip ties in there as a long term fix. Either metal hose clamps or metal lace wire would be the way to go.

-Dick
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

craigb93 wrote:I do not recommend you leave the plastic zip ties in there as a long term fix. Either metal hose clamps or metal lace wire would be the way to go.
Trying to find some hose clamps that are smaller; most people indicate hose clams won't let it fit through the opening.

Thanks.
waynet1
Posts: 2524
Joined: Jan 10, 2011 11:49 AM
Location: Port Charlotte,FL-Newport,RI

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by waynet1 »

cek wrote:
craigb93 wrote:I do not recommend you leave the plastic zip ties in there as a long term fix. Either metal hose clamps or metal lace wire would be the way to go.
Trying to find some hose clamps that are smaller; most people indicate hose clams won't let it fit through the opening.

Thanks.
Try these.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

waynet1 wrote: Try these.
I guess I have a date at Lowes tomorrow. Thanks!
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

No time to go to Lowes today and no time to wrench. So I just ordered these on Amazon. I figure that over time I'll figure out good uses for the other 98 that will come in the package.

Image
maybeillbuyit
Posts: 535
Joined: Feb 01, 2014 12:00 PM
Location: Vancouver BC

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by maybeillbuyit »

CEK, I like the look of your walbro set up. I wish I hadn't just received my new bosch inline pump from amazon. Just wondering, the "stock" rubber reducer you cut down to hook up your walbro, was that the original rubber that came out of the tank or did you get it from the dealer? Also I wonder if nylon is ok with gas? Just wondering. Looks great
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

The rubber reducer was on the original OE pump.

It's cek, not CEK. Sheesh. That's like people who call me Chuck. I tell them "you can call me Chuck. Once."
maybeillbuyit
Posts: 535
Joined: Feb 01, 2014 12:00 PM
Location: Vancouver BC

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by maybeillbuyit »

Oh sorry about that Chu...... I mean cek :)
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

maybeillbuyit wrote:Oh sorry about that Chu...... I mean cek :)
;)

:moon:
PDX5
Posts: 528
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Portland, Oregon - Washington DC

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by PDX5 »

Charlie, take a look mid-way through this thread (http://www.mye28.com/viewtopic.php?t=98095), for your answer to why we don't used the stock reducer.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

Ah, well shit. The money quote:
Kyle in NO wrote:The stock rubber "hose" that connects the pump to the pickup WILL rupture when using a 255lph pump. AMHIK. The clamps will just speed the process along.
Never braised before. Guess I get to learn a new skill.
dam5h
Posts: 185
Joined: Apr 09, 2008 10:19 PM
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by dam5h »

I used silver solder and it holds fine.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

I got to thinking...

What if the smaller end of the original rubber reducer fit inside a 13mm fuel hose?
Image

Like this:
Image

I'd have the strength of real fuel hose, without having to resort to metal fabrication. Figured I'd give it a try. Used Oetiker clamps:
Image

Feels super-stout. Thoughts?
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

Got the old pump out and the reducer to the filter done.

Image

Sealed up the pump wires with F4 tape and tucked them away.

Now gotta go ship stuff to dub-nub and do some Honey-Doos and then I'll drop the in-tank pump in and see how it works...
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

Just like everyone else who's done this, I had to discover by myself that it's a REALLY tight fit and wrapping the pump with rubber just won't work. I'm not even sure why people try; I guessed the idea was to make the pump quieter.

Any-who, I slimmed it all up by using a single tie and one piece of rubber jammed in between the pump and the return tube to make it more straight and the metal zip tie even tighter.
Image

Image

Just got back from a test drive and it appears to be working great. I think my adjustable FPR dial shows a much more stable pressure when I blip the throttle.

Hope my trials & tribulations with this help others. If it falls apart or something you know I'll add to this thread... :beer:
wkohler
Posts: 50924
Joined: Oct 05, 2006 11:04 PM
Location: Phönix, Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by wkohler »

I like those ties. I need to get some. Is the nylon coupling you got rated for fuel? I used brass NPT fittings on the B7. Had to use the 5/16 harb to NPT, a coupler and an NPT to 3/8 barb. That was after discovering that having a Menards nearby would have been more useful than three different specialty hose and fitting stores.
tig
Posts: 9287
Joined: Mar 18, 2013 6:25 PM
Location: Durango
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by tig »

wkohler wrote:I like those ties. I need to get some.
Note they are hard to get tight. I had to get them as tight as I could by pulling with pliers and then use the rubber to expand the whole thing to make 'em really tight.
Is the nylon coupling you got rated for fuel?
Probably not.
maybeillbuyit
Posts: 535
Joined: Feb 01, 2014 12:00 PM
Location: Vancouver BC

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by maybeillbuyit »

I found this post really interesting , looks like I will be going the walbro route as I just installed a new bosch inline pump and found the intank unit that I thought was working was not :( Very poor timing on my part, at least I THINK I know what I'll do next. I just came across this: http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/15946/10002/-1?CT=999 I'm sure there are other options out there.
demetk
Posts: 8431
Joined: Aug 09, 2007 8:58 AM
Location: CT, USA

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by demetk »

Would a swagged copper tube that could be braised on work?
davintosh
Posts: 13948
Joined: Jan 28, 2009 1:05 AM
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by davintosh »

Dumb question time: Is there a reason not to use the smaller diameter pipe for the pump output? That would eliminate having multiple size hoses & adapters in the pump's output path. Putting an adapter on the return line would cause fewer pressure-related issues.

The only downside I can think of is losing the longer discharge pipe as a mounting point for the pump itself, but considering the fact that later model cars (e32s & e34s anyway) use pumps that only attach to the tank by way of hoses, I wouldn't think it'd be a huge issue. If it is an issue, extending the larger tube to the same length as the smaller tube wouldn't be a difficult thing either.

Flame suit on.
dam5h
Posts: 185
Joined: Apr 09, 2008 10:19 PM
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by dam5h »

Genius!
ElGuappo
Posts: 8130
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by ElGuappo »

Earlier cars did it too.
My euro '84 735 came with the 100 liter fuel tank, and had the bayonet mount tank level sender without a helper pump, and ONLY used the main in line pump.

So the other option here, instead of doing the in tank pump, would be to modify the pickup with piping from the top to the strainer, and only use an in line external pump.
davintosh
Posts: 13948
Joined: Jan 28, 2009 1:05 AM
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by davintosh »

I thought about the single external pump too, but I'm pressing ahead with the in-tank mod.

A couple more questions related to it:
  1. The stock return pipe connects to the fuel strainer body, which just has an integrated diverter to direct fuel away from the bottom of the tank. I'm guessing that isn't a terribly important feature, but would it make any difference to have the return pipe a few inches above the bottom of the tank? I'm debating whether to bother extending the 10mm tube or not.
  2. The Bentley says that the O-ring at the top of the sending unit ought to be replaced when the sender comes out; does anybody know what size it is? I may just take the thing over to the parts store and see if they can size one to it. The old one looks like it's been in there for the life of the car; all crusty and jammed in the little gap, and I doubt it'll come out in one piece.
ElGuappo
Posts: 8130
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: In-tank Fuel Pump Modification

Post by ElGuappo »

I wouldnt bother extendign the return pipe.
The oring when new is actually kinda square, at least the last one I bought was.
Total about 2", but its cheap so jus tbuy the BMW unit.
Post Reply