Why not twin turbo instead of a single turbo?
-
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
- Location: Lodi, California
Why not twin turbo instead of a single turbo?
You know how they obviously have a single turbo like on a V-6 or V-8 etc....
Is it a space issue?
Or not enough exhaust gas going through just 3 exhaust ports?
Or sequential turbochargers, like one small for low RPM boost and a bigger turbo for higher RPM?
Might be a dumb question but ive always wanted to know why there arent even twin setups for a 535.
Thanks
Is it a space issue?
Or not enough exhaust gas going through just 3 exhaust ports?
Or sequential turbochargers, like one small for low RPM boost and a bigger turbo for higher RPM?
Might be a dumb question but ive always wanted to know why there arent even twin setups for a 535.
Thanks
Twin turbos are commonplace on V motors since there's two banks of cylinders. Just put one turbo on each bank. Using a single turbo on a V motor requires a bit more plumbing usually.
There's really no advantage to using a twin setup on a straight six, since each turbo will only see half the exhaust volume. Sequential setups are technically complicated and offer little gain for the effort expended. My turbo reaches full boost (10psi) at around 3100rpm.
Two turbos also take up twice the space, and are difficult to plumb for intake and exhaust piping, particularly in the e28. Sweeney had to do some "interesting" modifications to his frame rail to get his to fit in the e24.
It could be done, it has been done, but there is little to be gained from doing it. I think BMW only did it on the 335i so they could use really small, fast spooling turbos.
Jeremy
There's really no advantage to using a twin setup on a straight six, since each turbo will only see half the exhaust volume. Sequential setups are technically complicated and offer little gain for the effort expended. My turbo reaches full boost (10psi) at around 3100rpm.
Two turbos also take up twice the space, and are difficult to plumb for intake and exhaust piping, particularly in the e28. Sweeney had to do some "interesting" modifications to his frame rail to get his to fit in the e24.
It could be done, it has been done, but there is little to be gained from doing it. I think BMW only did it on the 335i so they could use really small, fast spooling turbos.
Jeremy
-
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
- Location: Lodi, California
Quite long with proper tuning. Mines had 37k of hard miles before I went to the M30b35 engine runing 425lb-ft. It would have went another 35k even with the leaking head gasket. Most will go 75k+ with good maintenance.Super Eurobeat wrote:Okay just wanted to know, that makes sense.
It makes me wonder how long some of these motors will last seeing as they are producing over 400 foot pounds and over 350 HP...
RussC
http://www.bmw535bitic.com/
or
http://www.praerien-racing.com/prosjekt ... /index.htm
Search and you shall find !
or
http://www.praerien-racing.com/prosjekt ... /index.htm
Search and you shall find !
Nothing really "interesting" about it and it wasn't the frame rail, rather, part of the inner fender structure. This could have been avoided if I had another hunk of aluminum tube bend on hand. When I sell the twin turbo setup I'll make that piece so the buyer need not notch.Jeremy wrote: Sweeney had to do some "interesting" modifications to his frame rail to get his to fit in the e24.
-
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
'86 M635 chassis w/Eibach Pro springs and Billy sports, adjustable rear subframe, M30B35, bored 0.5mm, JE 8.5:1 pistons, balanced, "M" throttles, GT35 spinny thing along with all the bits to connect the open ends together, TCD MegaSquirt ala Peter Florence, Alpina 8.5x17 and 10x17 wheels with big meats..... or I'm gonna lop the roof off of it and turn it into a hot tub.
-
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
- Location: Lodi, California
Built up, it won't. Any time you increase the performance of a motor, you decrease its life expectancy. Lifetime of a turbo motor is highly dependant on maintenance and use. I think a street driven m30 on moderate boost would survive to 150k miles at least.Super Eurobeat wrote:thats it? like 75,000 miles? ouch!
i would hope that my engine built up lasts over 300,000.....
Jeremy
On moderate boost levels it won't last 300k,no way no how. Im was running 13-14psi. An M30 wont last that long on that kind of boost. Id say 75-100k. It is 425-450lb-ft after all.Super Eurobeat wrote:thats it? like 75,000 miles? ouch!
i would hope that my engine built up lasts over 300,000.....
Moderate boost levels will get you farther as Jermey stated, and at 9-10psi, you could expect 150k.
RussC
-
- Posts: 11941
- Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
- Location: Lodi, California
Unless you are going find a reasonable way to attach a positive displacement SC to a m30 then you can forget about any low end boost.superj wrote:how come no one talks about supercharging? it seems to be just as easy and then you will have the low rpm power also.
oh yes, hi everyone. long time no see.
Lack of turbos boosting at low rpm is a thing of the past. Any properly setup turbo will produce boost at a very low rpm on a m30.
Todd