M106 or m30b35 for future turbo motor?

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
wjones
Posts: 193
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: PA

M106 or m30b35 for future turbo motor?

Post by wjones »

I'm asking for opinions. I want to build up a turbo motor for future use. My current motor is 10:1 and that wouldn't be the best to use.

Engine management shouldn't be a part of the equation.

Would you rather use a M106 (just block and head, not the manifold) or a M30B35 block and head?

I guess I eliminated the b34 because I can locate a M106 with the minor extras for the same $.
Jeremy
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 15844
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Connecticut

Post by Jeremy »

If you're using a TCD kit, the M106 will have the wrong size studs (too big). Fixable, but a pain.

I vote for m3035 with a set of Todd's pistons for 8-8.5:1 static CR.

Jeremy
vance
Posts: 1576
Joined: Aug 26, 2006 11:22 PM
Location: Home of 5erFest 2009

Post by vance »

My vote would be for the m106 block with the b35 head and intake using the appropriate pistons. If the m106 is available it has the piston oil squirters and the block is tap fpr turbo drainback and knock sensors. Just my two cents worth.

Vance
wjones
Posts: 193
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: PA

Post by wjones »

I won't consider taking apart the block. It's not worth it. I want a throw away motor which means no custom pistons. The hassle with the studs does make me reconsider a m30b34, after all Todd has had good success with it.
gol10dr1
Posts: 394
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: boston (maryland during summer)

Post by gol10dr1 »

vance wrote:My vote would be for the m106 block with the b35 head and intake using the appropriate pistons. If the m106 is available it has the piston oil squirters and the block is tap fpr turbo drainback and knock sensors. Just my two cents worth.

Vance
b35 block is tapped for a knock sensor as well. m106 motor is more "turbo friendly" from the get go but the m30b35 has a higher compression ratio which would limit the boost and tune combo you could use. if you are looking for wild power without cracking open the motor, you should probably go with the m106. if under 400 rwhp is your goal, go with the m30 b35, it is a fucking rock of a motor.
Shawn D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 22099
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Contact:

Post by Shawn D. »

gol10dr1 wrote:b35 block is tapped for a knock sensor as well.
Where is that on the engine? I've got an early M30B35 out of an E24 that has a different external block configuration and would like to see if it has the same provision. TIA!
Boru
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jul 04, 2008 10:09 AM

Post by Boru »

Shawn,
Here 'tis on a '92... M8 hole just east of the core plug, exhaust side.
Image
Shawn D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 22099
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Contact:

Post by Shawn D. »

Thanks for the pic, John. I'll have to check that out next time I'm in the vicinity of the block.
vance
Posts: 1576
Joined: Aug 26, 2006 11:22 PM
Location: Home of 5erFest 2009

Post by vance »

Am I correct in thinking that a m30b34 is not tapped for the sensor?

Vance
Post Reply