Turbo an Alpina M30?

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
MXH_RHD
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 16, 2006 7:48 AM
Location: Surrey, England

Turbo an Alpina M30?

Post by MXH_RHD »

Greetings from England :D

I've noticed that TCD are having a lot of success in turbo charging a standard M30 engine. However, Alpina with their E28 B9/B10 and E34 B10 offered a modified M30 engine giving a bit more power (218bhp -> 245/260bhp). What impact would these changes have with respect to their suitability to be turbo charged? Would they be more/less robust? Would they have more/less potential for power gains?
gol10dr1
Posts: 394
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: boston (maryland during summer)

Post by gol10dr1 »

i am guessing they have a much different cam profile (suited for NA applications) and a higher compression, neither of which are ideal for turbocharging.
MXH_RHD
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 16, 2006 7:48 AM
Location: Surrey, England

Post by MXH_RHD »

Engine

6 cylinder in line, capacity 3430 cc, bore/stroke 92/86 mm, compression ratio 9,8 : 1, max. power 191 KW/260 bhp (DIN) at 6000 rpm, max. torque 325 Nm (240 lb ft) at 4000 rpm

Crankshaft running in 7 bearings, light alloy cylinder head with hemisperical combustion chambers, long connecting rods with extra light short MAHLE pistons to reduce friction loss, piston head cooling, forced lubrication with oil filter in main stream, engine oil cooler, water cooling with thermal-controlled viscous fan, electronic grid-controlled ignition and fuel injection with fuel supply cut-off, BOSCH motronic M1.3

EDIT : This is E34 B10 (E28 B9/B10 have higher 10.2:1 & 10.6:1)
Last edited by MXH_RHD on Nov 16, 2006 8:00 AM, edited 1 time in total.
russc
Posts: 1759
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by russc »

You only limitation will be the compression ratio. 9.8:1 will limit your boost to ~5psi with M1.3.

Obviously the engine is configured for a higher rpm power band, that will be the same whether turbo's or not.

RussC
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Re: Turbo an Alpina M30?

Post by T_C_D »

MXH_RHD wrote:Greetings from England :D

I've noticed that TCD are having a lot of success in turbo charging a standard M30 engine. However, Alpina with their E28 B9/B10 and E34 B10 offered a modified M30 engine giving a bit more power (218bhp -> 245/260bhp). What impact would these changes have with respect to their suitability to be turbo charged? Would they be more/less robust? Would they have more/less potential for power gains?
A .120 MLS HG and studs will cure the high CR. The cam isn't a problem.

Todd
russc
Posts: 1759
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by russc »

What will the head gasket lower it to?

RussC
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

russc wrote:What will the head gasket lower it to?

RussC
~9.0 to 1
russc
Posts: 1759
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Post by russc »

Wow,
I didn't know it would lower it that much!

RussC
MXH_RHD
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 16, 2006 7:48 AM
Location: Surrey, England

Post by MXH_RHD »

OK, so here's my understanding so far.

The alpina engine isn't as suitable for turbo charging due to it's higher compression. However, this can be lowered to something similar to the standard M30 using a different head gasket, presumably sacrificing a few bhp. The engine is then suitable for turbo charging but will exhibit the same 'more rev happy' characteristics of the alpina engine. i.e. Produce max output about 300 revs further up the range (6000 against 5700, torque both at 4000).

So I wouldn't necessarily be looking at an engine swap. :D
MXH_RHD
Posts: 20
Joined: Oct 16, 2006 7:48 AM
Location: Surrey, England

Post by MXH_RHD »

I've been looking into this further and I've found the following compression ratios for UK cars.

Code: Select all

		   535i	B9	   B10
E28/24	10:1	10,2:1  10,6:1
E34/32	 9:1	 	     9,8:1
These are all a bit of a worry as I believe the TCD figures apply to the USA cars with a much lower 8:1 ratio.
Has anyone turbo'd cars with these specs? Did you lower the compression ratio? How? Different head gasket? Other?
Andy335Touring
Posts: 41
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: UK, Nottingham

Post by Andy335Touring »

Might be worth selling on the Alpina engine for some turbo project funds and starting with a normal 9.0:1 M30b35 ?
M635CSi
Posts: 1587
Joined: Apr 09, 2006 6:25 PM
Location: .From Sea to Shining Sea

Post by M635CSi »

MXH_RHD wrote:I've been looking into this further and I've found the following compression ratios for UK cars.

Code: Select all

		   535i	B9	   B10
E28/24	10:1	10,2:1  10,6:1
E34/32	 9:1	 	     9,8:1
These are all a bit of a worry as I believe the TCD figures apply to the USA cars with a much lower 8:1 ratio.
Has anyone turbo'd cars with these specs? Did you lower the compression ratio? How? Different head gasket? Other?
Bolt a turbocharger on that bad boy!

Pull the cylinder head and cc the combustion chambers. I'm guessing you'll be able to get the comression down into the 9.0:1 > 9.5:1 range by some judicias unshouding of the valves, sinking them a bit into their seats (not too much!) and using a thicker (MLS) head gasket (with studs). Install a stand alone ignition/fuel system and finnish with a dollop of high octane fuel. Your car will pull like a fraight train!!!
"Image" -http://www.performore.com/technical_art ... o/main.htm
Tjn182
Posts: 1782
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Charlotte, NC

Post by Tjn182 »

MXH_RHD wrote:I've been looking into this further and I've found the following compression ratios for UK cars.

Code: Select all

		   535i	B9	   B10
E28/24	10:1	10,2:1  10,6:1
E34/32	 9:1	 	     9,8:1
These are all a bit of a worry as I believe the TCD figures apply to the USA cars with a much lower 8:1 ratio.
Has anyone turbo'd cars with these specs? Did you lower the compression ratio? How? Different head gasket? Other?
Most of us with the 8.0:1 compression did not make any modifications to the engine. 8.0:1 is a low enough number as it is, and is quite boost friendly... I think Todd found the max PSI on the 8.0:1's to be about 22psi before the engine really starts to take a beating? 9.0:1 is also friendly towards boost, around about 15psi with some engine management and proper intercooling.
Post Reply