Duke M535ti wrote:M635CSi wrote: running straight (distilled) water during the heat of summer has been known to result in cracked heater cores; YMMV.
Duke M535ti wrote:Why,
Freezing the heater core causes the water within to expand and split it open.
Duke M535ti wrote:examples?
Cars with the heater core mounted directly after the AC evaporator in the air stream. Some GM cars are like this among others. Call or write to Red Line if you want more examples:
Red Line Synthetic Oil Corporation
6100 Egret Court
Benicia, CA 94510
PHONE: (707) 745-6100 or (800) 624-7958
FAX: (707) 745-3214
M635CSi wrote: either take a system wide approach to engineering and bite the (financial) bullet at the beginning or risk good money after bad as you continually patch what was your initially poor work product.
Duke M535ti wrote:WTF are you talking about now? Stop being so cryptic and due tell us what a "system wide approach" is. And what is this "poor work product" you speak of?
A system wide approach to
engineering (the word and activity you’ve left out) is a “good plan.” When I refer to a systems approach I mean not fighting the last war (fixing your car) when you’re trying to win the current war – getting a reliable M30 to make 500 or 600 horsepower. All in, your car is a pretty poor work product; after numerous engine rebuilds it’s still unreliable, it still overheats and its still breaking down…Houston, we’ve got a problem.
To your credit, you continue to make violent frontal assaults on each and every problem you encounter; probably why I still like hearing about your exploits.
Being a military man you’re no doubt familiar with the saying “A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” - Gen. George S. Patton. Its noteworthy Patton didn’t say “A shitty plan…” he said a “good plan…” You’ve got the violent part pretty much down pat, now just upgrade from shitty plans to good plans and you’ll be all set – non cryptic enough?
Duke M535ti wrote:I see a system wide approach is what we have been discussing - Skeen has found a 50% larger radiator that will fit. I think that that radiator with modifications for mounting brackets, coolant tank fitting and radiator cap delete will work great.
It does seem Skeen has found a good radiator to reduce coolant temperatures in his car and at a good price; I applaud that. However, addressing an overheating problem with a car is not the same as a systems approach to engineering a 500 or 600 horsepower M30 engine which, if I’m understanding correctly, is what you want your car to produce.
Duke M535ti wrote:Looking at water pumps, the E34 M5 3.8 has a pump that is 4X the cost of the M30 pump. Some research needs to be done to figure out if it does pump more water or if the price is just a ///M thing.
Good example of how BMW takes a systems approach to engineering their products. They certainly could have bolted the M30 pump to the S38 engine but decided to specify one more suited to the operating parameters of the four valve engine. You will find, I suspect, that the S38 (and M88) engines use water pumps with, at minimum, different bearings. When what is needed for a high output turbocharged M30 is higher coolant volume through the engine. The S38/M88 engines can sink more thermal load than the M30 engine even with the same water pump and radiator.
Duke M535ti wrote:Delete the fan and replace with one or two (offset) electric fans, a 20 lb cap and a 71 C thermostat and I think that would be a very robust cooling system for the FI M30 running 15+ psi of boost. You know my approach on the intercooler issue.
How did you arrive at the conclusion a 20 lb cap and 71 C thermostat is what’s needed? Why not a 100 lb cap, a 20 C thermostat and a reeeeeally foookin BIG radiator?
Don’t just give an answer, show your work; how did you arrived at which cap and thermostat to use?