The ignition is triggered off an e34 crank wheel & sensor.How is the ignition triggered on this setup?
Turbo Cowtipping (my F.I. build) 2/2014 addendum
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
Well tonight I pulled the injectors & swapped in a thought-to-be-good set. Afterwards I adjusted MS for the change in injectors. Car ran exactly the same. This weekend I'll get the darned compression test done & expect some data pointing to the head being fubarred!
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
small update:
Skipped the comp test since Mike came by Friday. He touched my car in some odd manner & it now runs fine.
Problem must've been an electrical connection. Will get around to a pull test eventually... It was running fine with the old injectors I swapped in. Put the new 42lbs ones back in & still all good. This must prove the issue couldn't have been the head.
Figured out why MS wasn't reading afr right, I had it connected to the narrow band spare output side of the lc-1. Now I have MS & the afr gauge wired together into the same wideband output side of the sensor. Is this right? MS now reads fine, but there is about a 1 point difference between it & the gauge.
I'm reading on how to adjust the tune & it still seems a tad mystical. Do I just have someone drive the car while I adjust the table to 14.7:1 for a given rpm & load?
Headed to work now...
Skipped the comp test since Mike came by Friday. He touched my car in some odd manner & it now runs fine.
Problem must've been an electrical connection. Will get around to a pull test eventually... It was running fine with the old injectors I swapped in. Put the new 42lbs ones back in & still all good. This must prove the issue couldn't have been the head.
Figured out why MS wasn't reading afr right, I had it connected to the narrow band spare output side of the lc-1. Now I have MS & the afr gauge wired together into the same wideband output side of the sensor. Is this right? MS now reads fine, but there is about a 1 point difference between it & the gauge.
I'm reading on how to adjust the tune & it still seems a tad mystical. Do I just have someone drive the car while I adjust the table to 14.7:1 for a given rpm & load?
Headed to work now...
I have my lc-1 wired to my gauge with one output and MS is getting the second output. I don't think you should be feeding both the gauge and MS from the same output, but maybe I'm wrong and it doesn't matter. I did have a problem where my innovate gauge and MS were almost 1 point different. The problem was the way I was grounding the lc-1. Originally I had all the lc-1 grounds together on one lug. I split them between 2 lugs and then my readings were the same between the innovate gauge and MS.
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
Well I was able to finally get MS to coincide with the gauge. I had to set TS to "wbo2 not listed" & then programmed in the hi/low voltage values into TS that the lc1 manual stated. Both are spot on now.Jared S wrote:I have my lc-1 wired to my gauge with one output and MS is getting the second output. I don't think you should be feeding both the gauge and MS from the same output, but maybe I'm wrong and it doesn't matter. I did have a problem where my innovate gauge and MS were almost 1 point different. The problem was the way I was grounding the lc-1. Originally I had all the lc-1 grounds together on one lug. I split them between 2 lugs and then my readings were the same between the innovate gauge and MS.
I thought the 2nd output on the Lc1 was just a narrowband out? Is this configurable?
-
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Mar 11, 2007 3:06 AM
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
- Posts: 6135
- Joined: Aug 05, 2007 4:57 PM
- Location: 24477
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
10/5/10 update
I'll get a pic up sooner or later of things being cleaned up slightly. I fully understand now how making 1 part of your car look good brings out how bad the rest looks.
I'm running bille sports w/spax springs & was on the 2nd to lowest perch. I switched tires from Potenza re050a 255/40/17 to a Sumitomo htz III. I think the htz's have a slight wider sectional-cross-width & there was just a hair of rubbing on the driver side (typical). So I raised the rear up a bit from the 2nd to lowest perch to the 4th. This gained about 1" of height & stiffened the rear up even more. No rubbing now, though I think the car may have rode just a tad bit better having a flat stance. Still early to tell.
I've been playing with the tuning side of things trying to "self-teach" myself. There's a heck of learning curve, but I'll get there. Yesterday took the car out for it's first drive (longer than 2 blocks). Went about 15 miles trying to feel things out. Very VERY light on the boost here & there since I'm not ready to blow things up yet. It made the brief flight. Nothing fell off, broke, burned up or croaked. Not too bad eh? Granted I was slightly under speed limit feeling the car out.
Couple of things learned.
I now know what slight detonation sounds like under boost & and have no intentions of making repeat performances.
Though a blowoff valve would be a cool novelty, I'm digging the swoosh of the bypass valve. I can see where this would come in quite handy in avoiding some "revenue generators" with red/blue lights.
After being on pins & needles just making a 20 mile round trip drive, I gotta wonder how I was gonna have kahunas big enough to drive to the last 5erFest.
There's a new need for me to re-learn how to drive an automatic. I have a new found anxiety of punching it & it down shifting from 4 to (something to low) hence immediately blowing shit up. Guess I'll have to play with the kickdown a bit.
There's a direct mathematical proportion increasing RPM near 2500ish to Holy $hit levels.
A fast car can make you more mindful of the speed limit, more or less.
I'll get a pic up sooner or later of things being cleaned up slightly. I fully understand now how making 1 part of your car look good brings out how bad the rest looks.
I'm running bille sports w/spax springs & was on the 2nd to lowest perch. I switched tires from Potenza re050a 255/40/17 to a Sumitomo htz III. I think the htz's have a slight wider sectional-cross-width & there was just a hair of rubbing on the driver side (typical). So I raised the rear up a bit from the 2nd to lowest perch to the 4th. This gained about 1" of height & stiffened the rear up even more. No rubbing now, though I think the car may have rode just a tad bit better having a flat stance. Still early to tell.
I've been playing with the tuning side of things trying to "self-teach" myself. There's a heck of learning curve, but I'll get there. Yesterday took the car out for it's first drive (longer than 2 blocks). Went about 15 miles trying to feel things out. Very VERY light on the boost here & there since I'm not ready to blow things up yet. It made the brief flight. Nothing fell off, broke, burned up or croaked. Not too bad eh? Granted I was slightly under speed limit feeling the car out.
Couple of things learned.
I now know what slight detonation sounds like under boost & and have no intentions of making repeat performances.
Though a blowoff valve would be a cool novelty, I'm digging the swoosh of the bypass valve. I can see where this would come in quite handy in avoiding some "revenue generators" with red/blue lights.
After being on pins & needles just making a 20 mile round trip drive, I gotta wonder how I was gonna have kahunas big enough to drive to the last 5erFest.
There's a new need for me to re-learn how to drive an automatic. I have a new found anxiety of punching it & it down shifting from 4 to (something to low) hence immediately blowing shit up. Guess I'll have to play with the kickdown a bit.
There's a direct mathematical proportion increasing RPM near 2500ish to Holy $hit levels.
A fast car can make you more mindful of the speed limit, more or less.
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: May 29, 2008 2:25 PM
- Location: Charlottesville, VA
-
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Mar 11, 2007 3:06 AM
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
Thanks!T_C_D wrote:Awesome! Automatic, loose converter and boost is really awesome!
And you probably thought it'd never get used.skip535i wrote:Where did you get that wicked-awesome gold valve cover??
Came in handy after all & looks pretty darned good, or at least I hope I do it justice.
Camera phone pics suck.cvillebimmer wrote:Wow! That looks fantastic. At first glance I thought the color of your valve color was "cosmoline."
I'd love to turn the boost up but there's a few things I'll probably address first to maximize efficiency at 7.5psi.M. Holtmeier wrote:Man that is looking good. I'm jealous of your chrome strut bar.
When are turning that thing up?
1. I need to get my radiator shroud/shelf installed. Hopefully this will aid in airflow through the HE & radiator.
2. IIRC we were seeing IAT of 140 degrees under sustained boost. That sounds like somewhat of the norm, but I'd like to see a sizeable drop. Is sub 100 too much to ask?
3. The intake charge pipe needs to be sealed off from sucking any air from the engine bay.
4. I'm still clueless at this whole map thing & will be bugging ya soon for more insight.
5. Electric fan is a must! Now that I have the engine temp gauge mounted I see the temp sits around 195 average. My goal here is to hover in the 185 neighborhood.
I have a few other tricks up my sleeve & probably a few I'm forgetting but am hoping all of this will gain some additional HP. Trying to get the most bang for my buck!
That's called the "I need 1 more piece to get this damn thing on the road" shield!JesterMX6 wrote:what is the old license plate shielding under there?
I'm not running a shroud and I routinely see about 175F.
Your IATs are going to be dependent on a ambient. I generally see about 15-20F above ambient. Although, like Mike, I've upgraded just about all of the system.
Have you made sure the intercooler system is properly bleed?
I recommend these two books for the basics on MAP based tuning (although they cover a lot of the same material)
http://www.amazon.com/Designing-Tuning- ... y_b_text_b
http://www.amazon.com/Engine-Management ... y_b_text_c
Your IATs are going to be dependent on a ambient. I generally see about 15-20F above ambient. Although, like Mike, I've upgraded just about all of the system.
Have you made sure the intercooler system is properly bleed?
I recommend these two books for the basics on MAP based tuning (although they cover a lot of the same material)
http://www.amazon.com/Designing-Tuning- ... y_b_text_b
http://www.amazon.com/Engine-Management ... y_b_text_c
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
George wrote:I'm not running a shroud and I routinely see about 175F.
Your IATs are going to be dependent on a ambient. I generally see about 15-20F above ambient. Although, like Mike, I've upgraded just about all of the system.
Have you made sure the intercooler system is properly bleed?
What are you running for a HE or HE's? 15-20F above definitely seems acceptable in my book! When we saw it hit 140, I think ambient was around 75ish outside at night. I'll let Mike chime in if he thinks different.
After the install I ran the intercooler pump & checked the water level in the IC, then topped off. Since then I've checked the level periodically. I suppose I should pop the screw from the tank & do a visual there also. Is there some additional process I've skipped?
Nebraska_e28 wrote:George wrote:I'm not running a shroud and I routinely see about 175F.
Your IATs are going to be dependent on a ambient. I generally see about 15-20F above ambient. Although, like Mike, I've upgraded just about all of the system.
Have you made sure the intercooler system is properly bleed?
What are you running for a HE or HE's? 15-20F above definitely seems acceptable in my book! When we saw it hit 140, I think ambient was around 75ish outside at night. I'll let Mike chime in if he thinks different.
After the install I ran the intercooler pump & checked the water level in the IC, then topped off. Since then I've checked the level periodically. I suppose I should pop the screw from the tank & do a visual there also. Is there some additional process I've skipped?
I'm currently using the Bosch cobra pump.
Part#: 0392022002
I'm using a custom set-up on the heat exchanger. modified an all aluminum Honda Civic radiator. Lots of surface area and plenty of capacity. I cut off the existing end tanks and made my own. I then welded on -10JIC Male fittings for the lines.
I have removed all of the A/C components though.
Make sure you you use the bleeder screw on the reservoir to get an air pockets out of the system. 65F above ambient is too high for a low boost system. I don't think you are getting full circulation of the water.
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
I did check the system & it didn't need to be bled, was still full. Guess it's e-fan time to tame things a bit. By the way if I didnt mention, I'm running a new t-stat, newer radiator & water pump (3 yrs/old).
Today I tipped over 1000 boosted miles & everything is still running great. Not to forget a tune that Mike was able to put together in maybe 2 hours or less! No broken parts or major leaks. All this on a motor that's probably in the neighborhood of 230k+. Hopefully that will all change over the winter but for now I'm having fun & being lazy about doing any upgrades.
Next major step now is to graduate from my FI embryo state in tuning. Will be doing a cozying up over the next week or so with my latest investments...
Today I tipped over 1000 boosted miles & everything is still running great. Not to forget a tune that Mike was able to put together in maybe 2 hours or less! No broken parts or major leaks. All this on a motor that's probably in the neighborhood of 230k+. Hopefully that will all change over the winter but for now I'm having fun & being lazy about doing any upgrades.
Next major step now is to graduate from my FI embryo state in tuning. Will be doing a cozying up over the next week or so with my latest investments...
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
11/8 update
Over the weekend I finally got around to installing the electric fans I purchased sometime last year. The most tedious part of this mod was taking double-checking all measurements to ensure the mounting holes aligned properly. The 2nd thing to note was remembering which output I configured on MS to control the fans. I went back to the notes I took during the MS build but they didn't help much since I must've changed my mind mid-build & went with a different output. No biggie though I rolled the dice & tested with a multimeter till I figured it out. So far I can say overall the car does run cooler than it did with the mechanical fan. They are currently setup to kick on at 197 & cool until 192 is reached. It's working well for the moment, but I'm sure I'll need to tweak things just a tad more.
Rescued from local Autozone trash
Stuffed into my recovery vehicle
Displaying proper use of PPE, though to be 100% correct my supporting hand should've been behind cutting path.
Intial design/mock-up
Final design after debating several cooling variables including laziness to finish the initial design.
before vs. after
Over the weekend I finally got around to installing the electric fans I purchased sometime last year. The most tedious part of this mod was taking double-checking all measurements to ensure the mounting holes aligned properly. The 2nd thing to note was remembering which output I configured on MS to control the fans. I went back to the notes I took during the MS build but they didn't help much since I must've changed my mind mid-build & went with a different output. No biggie though I rolled the dice & tested with a multimeter till I figured it out. So far I can say overall the car does run cooler than it did with the mechanical fan. They are currently setup to kick on at 197 & cool until 192 is reached. It's working well for the moment, but I'm sure I'll need to tweak things just a tad more.
Rescued from local Autozone trash
Stuffed into my recovery vehicle
Displaying proper use of PPE, though to be 100% correct my supporting hand should've been behind cutting path.
Intial design/mock-up
Final design after debating several cooling variables including laziness to finish the initial design.
before vs. after
-
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Mar 11, 2007 3:06 AM
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006 8:04 PM
- Location: Lincoln, NE
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
Honestly I'm not sure, but I probably can remove the whole radiator in less time. It is quite a bit easier to get at that "pain-in-the-azz" bottom radiator hose clamp.tsmall07 wrote:Looks like a solid install. Can you remove the fans without removing the radiator?
I spent the last 2 years studyingMr Project wrote:Fans look good! Details on what they are/where you obtained them?
I have a 16" electric on the E23 and wish I had gone with two smaller units for space considerations...it is TIGHT.
Mike's notes before I pulled the trigger. The fan's can be had on Summit racing, or do like me, print out their price, take to local auto store & have them price match, then use $ saved for bottle of Jack Daniels
It sucks that I wasn't able to make street night at the 1/8" mile strip last friday. From what I understand they are shut down for the year, so no breaky break for me till 2011.
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
Just thought I'd post up a few pics of what's new on the project. It's pretty much been in hibernation since returning from TexFest last year & I just recently decided to get off my lazy azz to start in on the bodywork. This damned thing needs paint bady. No need in me having purrty motor & body that looks battle scarred.
These are just a few prelim pics & still a long wasy to go...
I tried the 'penny' trick using a little duct tape on the rear holes (I'm no expert) & failed miserably...
Brick worked much better.
Still got a fair amount of grinding to do here, not to mention filling. And then there's a matter of filling the front holes as well.
These are just a few prelim pics & still a long wasy to go...
I tried the 'penny' trick using a little duct tape on the rear holes (I'm no expert) & failed miserably...
Brick worked much better.
Still got a fair amount of grinding to do here, not to mention filling. And then there's a matter of filling the front holes as well.
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
So far working great! Prior to purchase I also researched Miller & Lincoln. Then I went to a local exhaust shop. The owner has been using a Hobart regularly for 8 years with zero issues. I was sold.Mab1957 wrote:How is that Hobart 140 working for you? Keep posting, this is very interesting to observe.
-
- Beamter
- Posts: 9062
- Joined: Apr 13, 2006 11:18 PM
- Location: Council Bluffs, IA
- Contact:
A little more progress. This shit is tedious as hell!
I gotta save these stickers! (not to mention the new tint)
I gotta save these stickers! (not to mention the new tint)
Last edited by Nebraska_e28 on May 14, 2012 8:29 AM, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
- Location: The Boonies, Mn
- Contact:
I've got the same welder and love it. It's done several car projects and gets used most every day. Worth every penny!Nebraska_e28 wrote:So far working great! Prior to purchase I also researched Miller & Lincoln. Then I went to a local exhaust shop. The owner has been using a Hobart regularly for 8 years with zero issues. I was sold.Mab1957 wrote:How is that Hobart 140 working for you? Keep posting, this is very interesting to observe.