e12 intake, e28 TB, stock m30b34, 4hp22 w/3K tq conv (for now)T_C_D wrote:ITBs with the b24 cam and 4hp22?
Fabbing up some simple brackets for the fuel rail, & trying to figure a way to extend the cruise control cable.
One thing to take into account with the E12 manifold is that one can install different runners on it. If memory serves, you can use parts from two M10 manifolds of similar vintage to give the E12 intake longer runners, theoretically moving peak torque to lower RPM. I recall Paul B mentioning this setup somewhere here.scarey013 wrote:Just curious why you're going with the E12 intake when other members have tested them to be inferior to the later B35 units?
Edit: Actually, there are multiple threads that argue that fact and they come out to opposing conclusions. I wonder if anyone has actually flow tested them?
Here's one in support of the older manifold:
http://www.mye28.com/viewtopic.php?t=83466&highlight=
I believe that Lito had dynos made with both manifolds and found the B35 to be better flowing, but I don't know if he changed his set-up between runs. I can't find the thread, though...
Scott
Honestly, I wanted to do something off the beaten path. I've never seen a e28 with an e12 intake. When's the last time anyonne else has seen one. For the setup/mods I have in mind, I think it'll be a while before the manifiold holds me back from making power.scarey013 wrote:Just curious why you're going with the E12 intake when other members have tested them to be inferior to the later B35 units?
Correct on the M10 parts. (which I have yet to source) It'll be interesting to see how things run when its all put back together. (within the week?)nerd of nerds wrote: One thing to take into account with the E12 manifold is that one can install different runners on it. If memory serves, you can use parts from two M10 manifolds of similar vintage to give the E12 intake longer runners, theoretically moving peak torque to lower RPM.
You can say that again!nerd of nerds wrote:
Either way, it's just a damned sexy manifold.
I'm not sure, still have 1 small tweak to see how well it works out. I suspect it may go away though since my next iteration of this project will utilize that real estate.M. Holtmeier wrote:Looks good! Is the coolant bottle staying?
What's so offensive about that plate? Looks like equal opportunity to me!
Tell me about it. I love the look, & the ride of the spax! A major deciding factor (be it right or wrong) in making the switch is tire wear on the inside of the front/rears due to camber. Recently I installed an adjustable rear subframe in effort to reduce this, but have yet to see the results. As for the front, I'm unsure if a 1/2" raise will bring camber closer to spec & allow my tires to last a bit longer. I'd guess I put maybe 10-15k miles on my first set.T_C_D wrote:Nebraska_e28 wrote:
Also, I decided to switch from spax springs to an mtech set that I've had laying around. Will see how things look when swapped.
Nebraska_e28 wrote: