Page 1 of 1

RHD m20 manifold fresh from the foundry

Posted: Dec 22, 2006 4:13 PM
by T_C_D
Image

This is an entirely new pattern. Not yet machined but almost ready for action.

Todd

Posted: Dec 22, 2006 11:59 PM
by booker
Nice!

Posted: Dec 23, 2006 10:59 AM
by Joe in FL
Awesome.

Something I'm curious about though:

How different are these manifolds as compared to the old LHD type? Aside from the logo now being on the "bottom" of course. Can we see a side-by-side comparison?

Posted: Dec 23, 2006 11:35 AM
by Boru
The flanges that mount to the head are inverted. The centers of the two fastening holes and the port don't lay on a common line nor are the fastening holes equidistant from the center of the port.
Simply flipping the RHD maniflod over results in a major offset of the ports. The main body of the manifold is essentially the same as the RHD model but with a larger WG mounting flange.

Posted: Dec 23, 2006 5:57 PM
by raceaddic
how is the flow in those manifolds ? must be quite much back pressure :? (with a relative small turbine)

Posted: Dec 23, 2006 7:08 PM
by bmw335is turbo
raceaddic wrote:how is the flow in those manifolds ? must be quite much back pressure :? (with a relative small turbine)
The manifolds flow pretty good for street/track cars.
back pressure? what psi were you thinking of running ist not ment for 25-30psi if that is what you are looking for,you might want to use a tube style.

The TDC kit is mabe mainly for a bolt on big power upgrade with further improvment possabilitys.
sorry for the spelling.

Posted: Dec 23, 2006 9:07 PM
by T_C_D
raceaddic wrote:how is the flow in those manifolds ? must be quite much back pressure :? (with a relative small turbine)
T4 flange. Size the turbine and housing as large as you desire.

The flow of the manifolds is as optimized as a log can be. The runners are smooth with soft radius into the log. The log increases in size as the numbers of runners increase.

Does it flow as well as a well designed equal length tubular manifold? Of course not, nor is it designed to. What people never mention is that a great flowing equal length tubular manifold adds so much volume and decresed pressure that the turbo takes considerably longer to spool. In addition the boost is harder to control. Big volume tubualr manifolds require huge wastegates.

Each has it's merits. Building a car with a goal of greater than 500rwhp than a equal length tubular manifold is probably the best choice. IMHO it needs to be a tuned equal length manifold. A non equal length manifold probably adds no value over a log style cast manifold.

Building a daily driver street car? Go with a cast log manifold. A quality casting will likely last longer than the car and certainly the Owner's attention span.

Todd

Posted: Dec 24, 2006 3:22 PM
by russc
T_C_D wrote:
Building a daily driver street car? Go with a cast log manifold. A quality casting will likely last longer than the car and certainly the Owner's attention span.

Todd
This is oh so true. Well put. Most people sell the car before a log manifold wears out.

As a point, I believe the manifold that Todd makes is superior in design to the Dinan manifold. Thats one reason his cars make more power at the same boost with lower octane fuel than my car.

RussC
Looking to have a TCD manifold on my E34 next year.

Posted: Dec 24, 2006 4:13 PM
by M635CSi
Plus, a cast iron manifold won't be as loud as a tubular manifold or radiate as much heat into the engine compartment.

While I believe the TCD manifold is superior to the Dinan M30 manifold I think it’s almost identical in flow characteristics to the Dinan M88/S38 manifold.

Posted: Dec 24, 2006 5:04 PM
by T_C_D
M635CSi wrote: While I believe the TCD manifold is superior to the Dinan M30 manifold I think it’s almost identical in flow characteristics to the Dinan M88/S38 manifold.
Does it have a tapered log?

Posted: Dec 24, 2006 5:20 PM
by russc
M635CSi wrote:Plus, a cast iron manifold won't be as loud as a tubular manifold or radiate as much heat into the engine compartment.

While I believe the TCD manifold is superior to the Dinan M30 manifold I think it’s almost identical in flow characteristics to the Dinan M88/S38 manifold.
I haven't seen a S38 Dinan manifold? Is it different than the M30?

RussC

Posted: Dec 24, 2006 6:29 PM
by M635CSi
T_C_D wrote:
M635CSi wrote: While I believe the TCD manifold is superior to the Dinan M30 manifold I think it’s almost identical in flow characteristics to the Dinan M88/S38 manifold.
Does it have a tapered log?
Yes...
Image
Image

Posted: Dec 24, 2006 6:32 PM
by M635CSi
russc wrote:
M635CSi wrote:Plus, a cast iron manifold won't be as loud as a tubular manifold or radiate as much heat into the engine compartment.

While I believe the TCD manifold is superior to the Dinan M30 manifold I think it’s almost identical in flow characteristics to the Dinan M88/S38 manifold.
I haven't seen a S38 Dinan manifold? Is it different than the M30?

RussC
Yes, much different. The Dinan S38 manifold is very similar to the Dinan M88 manifold.;) I was surprised when I saw how different the M30 one was.
Image
They used the Porsche 944 turbo air filter housing.

Posted: Dec 25, 2006 12:08 AM
by russc
:thanks:

RussC

Posted: Dec 26, 2006 3:49 PM
by Tjn182
So how well will these fit under a LHD (ameeeerican).. 6 series? :)

Posted: Dec 26, 2006 4:00 PM
by booker
What 6 series came with an m20?

Posted: Dec 27, 2006 3:17 AM
by Tjn182
doh! the whole time I thought it was for the m30!! :alright:

Posted: Dec 28, 2006 12:48 AM
by M635CSi
booker wrote:What 6 series came with an m20?
None.

Posted: Dec 28, 2006 10:34 PM
by booker
M635CSi wrote:
booker wrote:What 6 series came with an m20?
None.
Really?

Posted: Dec 31, 2006 12:07 AM
by Azure
booker wrote:
M635CSi wrote:
booker wrote:What 6 series came with an m20?
None.
Really?
Smallest engine as I recall was the m30 based 628CSi, or the 633CSi in the US.