MyE28.com

at BF.c


Looks OK, not really that impressive, but the first dyno Ive seen of it.

RussC

Why do they use a different torque scale, and not include it in the graph? It really makes it look goofy without the same scale for HP and Torque. Either that or it is a completely bogus graph.

I hate retouched and fancified dyno graphs. Just put the numbers up already.

FWIW my stock with just a BavAuto chip '91 made 180/195 (the stock numbers were very close to their stock numbers). Seems like a MAF with a tune should be worth more than that.

Also, what's with stopping at 5400? The hp hasn't really started falling too much at that point.

Hey you guys... We don't frequent this forum because we are not here to take away from Todd, as we know he is dominant member on this forum. But, This issue with the dyno sheets has surfaced and we just need to assure you what the issue is.

All we did was for ease of use on the forums was trace two sheets onto one. Not to exaggerate any gains just to state the 100% before and After results. The Dyno we use has so many different settings and no dyno is the same especially when your talking about different brand names. Here are three scans of the ACTUAL dyno sheets. They are on a Time vs. Power graph. We know that it should be in RPM but thats the way the dyno rendered these readings.

http://www.millerperformancecars.com/images/dyno003.jpg
This is the STOCK 535i

http://www.millerperformancecars.com/images/dyno002.jpg
http://www.millerperformancecars.com/images/dyno001.jpg
These next two are the 535 WITH MAF, one run was cut short and you will be able to tell which one that is.

We are not denying the fact that the dyno sheets were drawn up, but we only did that for ease of use. As you can see, the facts are RIGHT there in the three seperate sheets.

Thanks,
-Dan-

Thanks for clearing that up! I'm sure the MAF system does give a signifigant bump over the primitive AFM setup these cars are stricken with. Good job!