Noob to M30's

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Noob to M30's

Post by Good & Tight »

Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Re: Noob to M30's

Post by T_C_D »

Good & Tight wrote:Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
For your 318i? Thought you would go 24v?

You want the m30b35 cyl ead from a 88-92 735 or 89-92 535i. Almost all the bottom ends are the same with the exception of bore from 84-92.

Todd
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Re: Noob to M30's

Post by Good & Tight »

T_C_D wrote:
Good & Tight wrote:Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
For your 318i? Thought you would go 24v?

You want the m30b35 cyl ead from a 88-92 735 or 89-92 535i. Almost all the bottom ends are the same with the exception of bore from 84-92.

Todd
Hey Todd
yeah I gave it some good thought and for the power I need the M30 will be good enough with less moving parts plus it's similar to the M10.
So far I have a set of 95mm forged flat tops and a 81 3.0/3.2 turbo block and crank, was hoping the turbo crank had the smaller crank but from what I have read it's the same stroke as the 3.5.
My thoughts would be having the smaller stroke with larger bore to rev to 8000 and around 20psi or more if it stays together :laugh:
I'm searching for the B35 head and also a 265 5 speed.
DMS
Posts: 107
Joined: Apr 29, 2007 6:19 AM
Location: The Netherlands

Post by DMS »

kinda wondering what kinda turbo you'll use. You are gonna post up at E30tech right?

I'm kinda happy you turned the M30 route and I'll follow your progress with interest. Perhaps I'll steel some thoughed of your setup for my E12.

Regards.
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

DMS wrote:kinda wondering what kinda turbo you'll use. You are gonna post up at E30tech right?

I'm kinda happy you turned the M30 route and I'll follow your progress with interest. Perhaps I'll steel some thoughed of your setup for my E12.

Regards.
I'm gather parts and info at the moment, trying to locate a 80mm stroke crank. Haven't decided yet on the turbo, I have a Holset HX40 that I would like to try.
rundatrack
Posts: 454
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM

Post by rundatrack »

Good & Tight wrote:
DMS wrote:kinda wondering what kinda turbo you'll use. You are gonna post up at E30tech right?

I'm kinda happy you turned the M30 route and I'll follow your progress with interest. Perhaps I'll steel some thoughed of your setup for my E12.

Regards.
I'm gather parts and info at the moment, trying to locate a 80mm stroke crank. Haven't decided yet on the turbo, I have a Holset HX40 that I would like to try.

Holset hx50 FTW


:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
altus22
Posts: 621
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Norfolk, VA

Re: Noob to M30's

Post by altus22 »

Good & Tight wrote: Hey Todd
yeah I gave it some good thought and for the power I need the M30 will be good enough with less moving parts plus it's similar to the M10.
So far I have a set of 95mm forged flat tops and a 81 3.0/3.2 turbo block and crank, was hoping the turbo crank had the smaller crank but from what I have read it's the same stroke as the 3.5.
My thoughts would be having the smaller stroke with larger bore to rev to 8000 and around 20psi or more if it stays together :laugh:
I'm searching for the B35 head and also a 265 5 speed.
Which crank do you have, the 3.0 or the 3.2? The 3.0/2.8 is the 80mm you're looking for. I've got one sitting in my driveway. Why not go balls to the wall and go for the 72mm crank from the 2500/525?
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Re: Noob to M30's

Post by Good & Tight »

altus22 wrote:
Good & Tight wrote: Hey Todd
yeah I gave it some good thought and for the power I need the M30 will be good enough with less moving parts plus it's similar to the M10.
So far I have a set of 95mm forged flat tops and a 81 3.0/3.2 turbo block and crank, was hoping the turbo crank had the smaller crank but from what I have read it's the same stroke as the 3.5.
My thoughts would be having the smaller stroke with larger bore to rev to 8000 and around 20psi or more if it stays together :laugh:
I'm searching for the B35 head and also a 265 5 speed.
Which crank do you have, the 3.0 or the 3.2? The 3.0/2.8 is the 80mm you're looking for. I've got one sitting in my driveway. Why not go balls to the wall and go for the 72mm crank from the 2500/525?
I have the 86mm stroke crank from the 3.0/3.2 turbo block. The 72mm would be nice but hard to find. I think a good turbo setup would be a longer rod combo with less side load against the cylinder bore.

Found this link with crank info.
http://aaron.aussiefiverdriver.com/M30%20engine.htm
altus22
Posts: 621
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Norfolk, VA

Post by altus22 »

There are some guys on the Senior Six list with b25 and b28 engines. PM me if you want their contact info.
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

altus22 wrote:There are some guys on the Senior Six list with b25 and b28 engines. PM me if you want their contact info.
Have a lead on an 80mm stroke crank locally, hopefully it's in good shape, if not I will pm you.

There are some differences between the turbo block and later 3.5 blocks.

The front of the turbo block has no provision for the oil pump chain tensioner like the 3.5 and has one extra coolant hole between the cylinder bores

Turbo block
Image
Image

B35 block
Image
Image
griffith
Posts: 59
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Vancouver, WA

Post by griffith »

Hope those main caps are numbered....if not there's a line hone in your future!

Investigate your rod options as well as there are some differences in oiling methodology between the b35 rods and earlier variants. I'd have to go dig my b30 and b35 extra rods up for photos, but I can if you're interested.

Can you also send photos of the underside of that block casting? I'm curious.

Jason
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

griffith wrote:Hope those main caps are numbered....if not there's a line hone in your future!

Investigate your rod options as well as there are some differences in oiling methodology between the b35 rods and earlier variants. I'd have to go dig my b30 and b35 extra rods up for photos, but I can if you're interested.

Can you also send photos of the underside of that block casting? I'm curious.

Jason
Yes the main caps are numbered, but I will most likely get it line bored so it's perfect.
Here's the underside turbo block
Image
3.5 block
Image[/img]

The 3.5 block looks stronger with more support around the main caps, but for some reason the turbo block feels heavier, will have to weigh both to be sure.
Once I get the crank I will have a set of rods made to the pistons I have which have a compression height of1.146"
bimmerboy
Posts: 390
Joined: Oct 18, 2006 7:06 PM
Location: United States

Post by bimmerboy »

i have b25 bottom end. Not sure how much I want to give it up though. i was really hopin to eventually make a track engine with it
griffith
Posts: 59
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Vancouver, WA

Post by griffith »

Picked a rod manufacturer yet?

Turbo block is interesting, no oil squirters on that one. Huh... Must have been on the later model 745i's.

Jason
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

griffith wrote:Picked a rod manufacturer yet?

Turbo block is interesting, no oil squirters on that one. Huh... Must have been on the later model 745i's.

Jason
Either Pauter or Saenz.
The block is stamped 81, ah so the early blocks came w/oil squirters?
griffith
Posts: 59
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Vancouver, WA

Post by griffith »

I don't know which had the mythical oil squirters, I would guess the later models (I was saying, ahh the later models must have had the squirters).

Jason
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Some good news, scored a 1981 2.5/2.8 engine locally which has the 80mm stroke crank :alright:
GregATL
Posts: 792
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Appomattox Va

Post by GregATL »

I can tell this buildup is going to be good. Please document your connecting rod specs. And more on those pistons as well.

So, if I may ask, what are the numbers on the M10 these days?
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

GregATL wrote:I can tell this buildup is going to be good. Please document your connecting rod specs. And more on those pistons as well.

So, if I may ask, what are the numbers on the M10 these days?
The pistons are Wiseco 95mm with a 1.146" compression height. I need to measure the deck height (it's a little over 8")
and then figure what the rod ratio will be.

The M10 is dead, never had a chance to redyno it after installing the bigger turbo ITB's and clutch. So 359rwhp is all it made on paper. Here's a link to what happened to the engine.
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh ... p?t=849689
GregATL
Posts: 792
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Appomattox Va

Post by GregATL »

Thanks for the link. That was quite a finish to that story. It just goes to show that head gasket failure is the preferred method of turbo engine failures. Do you think it was tuning related at all or just too much mechanical stress? I know you were pushing 26 psi when you did the 359 hp figure but what were you up to at catastrophic failure level?
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

GregATL wrote:Thanks for the link. That was quite a finish to that story. It just goes to show that head gasket failure is the preferred method of turbo engine failures. Do you think it was tuning related at all or just too much mechanical stress? I know you were pushing 26 psi when you did the 359 hp figure but what were you up to at catastrophic failure level?
Mechanical stress, I really beat the piss out of that engine plus shifting at 8300 with stock rods :rofl: The last 3 surviving rods were all bent and most likely have been bent for a year, it was just a matter of time.
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

O.k back in the game, it's been awhile but scored good today.
A big thanks to Rennie Bryant from Redline.

Picked up two M30 a 2.5/2.8 with the 80mm stroke crank and a regular 3.5 + a 265 tranny.


Image

E34 oil pan for the E30 chassis and 265 bellhousing.
Image

Now for the good stuff, ported race head with titanium locks and keepers, double valve springs and Schrick cam.

Image

also a 90 3.5 head.

Image

Now the fun begins disassembling the engine and prepare it for some crazy boost.
I was thinking taking the spare 3.5 and setting it up in the car with the Megasquirt, fab the exhaust manifold and boost it till it pops :laugh:
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Was busy this weekend and decided to set the car up with the spare engine.

Installed the E34 oil pan and twin plate clutch setup from the M10, it weighs about 14lbs.

Image

Looks factory right?

Image
Image
Had to fab up some motor mounts, the after market ones wouldn't set it back far enough to my liking.

Image

Thats it for now, the drive shaft is about 4" to long, and will start to fab up the manifold.

Image
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Finished the manifold and test fit, slow progress but getting there
Image
Image
iXer
Posts: 96
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by iXer »

Looking good so far, just one question :
- Why not build the exhaust manifold to use the divided entry turbine housing to it's full potential while you're at it?
(not that turbo response will be that much of an issue on a 3.5 litre, people still complain even though their manifold isn't built right)
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

iXer wrote:Looking good so far, just one question :
- Why not build the exhaust manifold to use the divided entry turbine housing to it's full potential while you're at it?
(not that turbo response will be that much of an issue on a 3.5 litre, people still complain even though their manifold isn't built right)
Hey Mattias, I wanted to make it a true split pulse but it was just easier to make a single collector design to run the wastegate. I'll make another one if I'm not happy with it.

Got the intercooler mounted. :D

Image
jly535
Posts: 14
Joined: Jan 10, 2008 10:04 PM

Re: Noob to M30's

Post by jly535 »

Good & Tight wrote:Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
I have an m90 block that is already machined with piston oil squirt nozzles, this is the real 3.5 block from my euro 635 e12 based six. It is already painted and just needs to be bored for whatever pistons. Email me if interested or pics, Jamie jly535@comcast.net
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Small update. Made the downpipe and fitted wastegat

Image
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM

Post by Good & Tight »

Almost done, just need to clean up the wires. Got her to fire up now on to tuning, running MSII extra V3.0.

Image

Image

Image
Brad D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

Awesome stuff. I like the manifold with the flipped TB. It should be a monster.
Post Reply