Noob to M30's
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Noob to M30's
Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
Re: Noob to M30's
For your 318i? Thought you would go 24v?Good & Tight wrote:Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
You want the m30b35 cyl ead from a 88-92 735 or 89-92 535i. Almost all the bottom ends are the same with the exception of bore from 84-92.
Todd
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Re: Noob to M30's
Hey ToddT_C_D wrote:For your 318i? Thought you would go 24v?Good & Tight wrote:Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
You want the m30b35 cyl ead from a 88-92 735 or 89-92 535i. Almost all the bottom ends are the same with the exception of bore from 84-92.
Todd
yeah I gave it some good thought and for the power I need the M30 will be good enough with less moving parts plus it's similar to the M10.
So far I have a set of 95mm forged flat tops and a 81 3.0/3.2 turbo block and crank, was hoping the turbo crank had the smaller crank but from what I have read it's the same stroke as the 3.5.
My thoughts would be having the smaller stroke with larger bore to rev to 8000 and around 20psi or more if it stays together
I'm searching for the B35 head and also a 265 5 speed.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
I'm gather parts and info at the moment, trying to locate a 80mm stroke crank. Haven't decided yet on the turbo, I have a Holset HX40 that I would like to try.DMS wrote:kinda wondering what kinda turbo you'll use. You are gonna post up at E30tech right?
I'm kinda happy you turned the M30 route and I'll follow your progress with interest. Perhaps I'll steel some thoughed of your setup for my E12.
Regards.
-
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Good & Tight wrote:I'm gather parts and info at the moment, trying to locate a 80mm stroke crank. Haven't decided yet on the turbo, I have a Holset HX40 that I would like to try.DMS wrote:kinda wondering what kinda turbo you'll use. You are gonna post up at E30tech right?
I'm kinda happy you turned the M30 route and I'll follow your progress with interest. Perhaps I'll steel some thoughed of your setup for my E12.
Regards.
Holset hx50 FTW
Re: Noob to M30's
Which crank do you have, the 3.0 or the 3.2? The 3.0/2.8 is the 80mm you're looking for. I've got one sitting in my driveway. Why not go balls to the wall and go for the 72mm crank from the 2500/525?Good & Tight wrote: Hey Todd
yeah I gave it some good thought and for the power I need the M30 will be good enough with less moving parts plus it's similar to the M10.
So far I have a set of 95mm forged flat tops and a 81 3.0/3.2 turbo block and crank, was hoping the turbo crank had the smaller crank but from what I have read it's the same stroke as the 3.5.
My thoughts would be having the smaller stroke with larger bore to rev to 8000 and around 20psi or more if it stays together
I'm searching for the B35 head and also a 265 5 speed.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Re: Noob to M30's
I have the 86mm stroke crank from the 3.0/3.2 turbo block. The 72mm would be nice but hard to find. I think a good turbo setup would be a longer rod combo with less side load against the cylinder bore.altus22 wrote:Which crank do you have, the 3.0 or the 3.2? The 3.0/2.8 is the 80mm you're looking for. I've got one sitting in my driveway. Why not go balls to the wall and go for the 72mm crank from the 2500/525?Good & Tight wrote: Hey Todd
yeah I gave it some good thought and for the power I need the M30 will be good enough with less moving parts plus it's similar to the M10.
So far I have a set of 95mm forged flat tops and a 81 3.0/3.2 turbo block and crank, was hoping the turbo crank had the smaller crank but from what I have read it's the same stroke as the 3.5.
My thoughts would be having the smaller stroke with larger bore to rev to 8000 and around 20psi or more if it stays together
I'm searching for the B35 head and also a 265 5 speed.
Found this link with crank info.
http://aaron.aussiefiverdriver.com/M30%20engine.htm
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Have a lead on an 80mm stroke crank locally, hopefully it's in good shape, if not I will pm you.altus22 wrote:There are some guys on the Senior Six list with b25 and b28 engines. PM me if you want their contact info.
There are some differences between the turbo block and later 3.5 blocks.
The front of the turbo block has no provision for the oil pump chain tensioner like the 3.5 and has one extra coolant hole between the cylinder bores
Turbo block
B35 block
Hope those main caps are numbered....if not there's a line hone in your future!
Investigate your rod options as well as there are some differences in oiling methodology between the b35 rods and earlier variants. I'd have to go dig my b30 and b35 extra rods up for photos, but I can if you're interested.
Can you also send photos of the underside of that block casting? I'm curious.
Jason
Investigate your rod options as well as there are some differences in oiling methodology between the b35 rods and earlier variants. I'd have to go dig my b30 and b35 extra rods up for photos, but I can if you're interested.
Can you also send photos of the underside of that block casting? I'm curious.
Jason
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Yes the main caps are numbered, but I will most likely get it line bored so it's perfect.griffith wrote:Hope those main caps are numbered....if not there's a line hone in your future!
Investigate your rod options as well as there are some differences in oiling methodology between the b35 rods and earlier variants. I'd have to go dig my b30 and b35 extra rods up for photos, but I can if you're interested.
Can you also send photos of the underside of that block casting? I'm curious.
Jason
Here's the underside turbo block
3.5 block
[/img]
The 3.5 block looks stronger with more support around the main caps, but for some reason the turbo block feels heavier, will have to weigh both to be sure.
Once I get the crank I will have a set of rods made to the pistons I have which have a compression height of1.146"
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
The pistons are Wiseco 95mm with a 1.146" compression height. I need to measure the deck height (it's a little over 8")GregATL wrote:I can tell this buildup is going to be good. Please document your connecting rod specs. And more on those pistons as well.
So, if I may ask, what are the numbers on the M10 these days?
and then figure what the rod ratio will be.
The M10 is dead, never had a chance to redyno it after installing the bigger turbo ITB's and clutch. So 359rwhp is all it made on paper. Here's a link to what happened to the engine.
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh ... p?t=849689
Thanks for the link. That was quite a finish to that story. It just goes to show that head gasket failure is the preferred method of turbo engine failures. Do you think it was tuning related at all or just too much mechanical stress? I know you were pushing 26 psi when you did the 359 hp figure but what were you up to at catastrophic failure level?
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Mechanical stress, I really beat the piss out of that engine plus shifting at 8300 with stock rods The last 3 surviving rods were all bent and most likely have been bent for a year, it was just a matter of time.GregATL wrote:Thanks for the link. That was quite a finish to that story. It just goes to show that head gasket failure is the preferred method of turbo engine failures. Do you think it was tuning related at all or just too much mechanical stress? I know you were pushing 26 psi when you did the 359 hp figure but what were you up to at catastrophic failure level?
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
O.k back in the game, it's been awhile but scored good today.
A big thanks to Rennie Bryant from Redline.
Picked up two M30 a 2.5/2.8 with the 80mm stroke crank and a regular 3.5 + a 265 tranny.
E34 oil pan for the E30 chassis and 265 bellhousing.
Now for the good stuff, ported race head with titanium locks and keepers, double valve springs and Schrick cam.
also a 90 3.5 head.
Now the fun begins disassembling the engine and prepare it for some crazy boost.
I was thinking taking the spare 3.5 and setting it up in the car with the Megasquirt, fab the exhaust manifold and boost it till it pops
A big thanks to Rennie Bryant from Redline.
Picked up two M30 a 2.5/2.8 with the 80mm stroke crank and a regular 3.5 + a 265 tranny.
E34 oil pan for the E30 chassis and 265 bellhousing.
Now for the good stuff, ported race head with titanium locks and keepers, double valve springs and Schrick cam.
also a 90 3.5 head.
Now the fun begins disassembling the engine and prepare it for some crazy boost.
I was thinking taking the spare 3.5 and setting it up in the car with the Megasquirt, fab the exhaust manifold and boost it till it pops
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Was busy this weekend and decided to set the car up with the spare engine.
Installed the E34 oil pan and twin plate clutch setup from the M10, it weighs about 14lbs.
Looks factory right?
Had to fab up some motor mounts, the after market ones wouldn't set it back far enough to my liking.
Thats it for now, the drive shaft is about 4" to long, and will start to fab up the manifold.
Installed the E34 oil pan and twin plate clutch setup from the M10, it weighs about 14lbs.
Looks factory right?
Had to fab up some motor mounts, the after market ones wouldn't set it back far enough to my liking.
Thats it for now, the drive shaft is about 4" to long, and will start to fab up the manifold.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Looking good so far, just one question :
- Why not build the exhaust manifold to use the divided entry turbine housing to it's full potential while you're at it?
(not that turbo response will be that much of an issue on a 3.5 litre, people still complain even though their manifold isn't built right)
- Why not build the exhaust manifold to use the divided entry turbine housing to it's full potential while you're at it?
(not that turbo response will be that much of an issue on a 3.5 litre, people still complain even though their manifold isn't built right)
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Hey Mattias, I wanted to make it a true split pulse but it was just easier to make a single collector design to run the wastegate. I'll make another one if I'm not happy with it.iXer wrote:Looking good so far, just one question :
- Why not build the exhaust manifold to use the divided entry turbine housing to it's full potential while you're at it?
(not that turbo response will be that much of an issue on a 3.5 litre, people still complain even though their manifold isn't built right)
Got the intercooler mounted.
Re: Noob to M30's
I have an m90 block that is already machined with piston oil squirt nozzles, this is the real 3.5 block from my euro 635 e12 based six. It is already painted and just needs to be bored for whatever pistons. Email me if interested or pics, Jamie jly535@comcast.netGood & Tight wrote:Hi all, just wanted to introduce myself and looking forward learning all the different types of engine codes and internal part combos and possibilities for the M30.
In searching I found a wealth of info already.
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM
-
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Oct 29, 2007 11:16 AM